Posts Tagged ‘Sarah Palin’

Apparent hypocrisy by Sarah Palin?

March 10, 2010 2 comments

Thanks Pete for this link, well sort of, I am not sure why he showed this to me…..

So apparently, Palin is a hypocrite for crossing the border for health care. Except that this is totally unremarkable. Sarah Palin decided to go from Bumblehickville, Alaska to the nearest city which happened to be Whitehorse, Yukon. Wow. Health care in a sparsely populated area of a modern nation is usually worse than that of a more densely populated area of another modern nation.

While I usually find all HufPo writers disagreeable, I think this attempt to beat down a straw man, in Sarah Palin is stupid. If anything the net flow is definitely skewed towards the US. The wiki verdict is that though some of these pro-American claims are exaggerated, some of their political leaders have come down her for major surgeries, quotas have created space problems in their hospitals and their hospitals have difficulty handling rarer cases. Meanwhile, Americans go up for cheaper drugs (since Canadians don’t invent any, they can just mooch) and marijuana (probably those libertarians)…..

The real arguments against this health care bill don’t find their merits in the premise, “all Canadian health care just sucks and can never be used.”  There are plenty of solid arguments, some I have mentioned previously, against this bill. Its not cost-neutral, it reduces choice, it depresses innovation, etc. Oh yea, and most people don’t want it. While I am not a fan of status quo either, I think Mankiw’s analogy is a good one.

The railing on Palin is something else though. While I find her immensely irritating, I find people who make sport to find everything she does as stupid, even more irritating. She was elected governor of a state, something most douchey college students would have no shot at doing. I am not surprised liberals are making it a sport to try to criticize everything she does. Welcome to the big leagues Obama-philes, beating the crap out of Palin might boost your self-esteem a little bit, but that’s not gonna get anyone of the 53% to be convinced this health care plan is any good.

Categories: Politics Tags: ,

The word “retard”….

February 9, 2010 5 comments

Rahm Emmanuel’s invidious use of the word retard has been heavily criticized. Take from it what you want, as Rush Limbaugh used it similar fashion. Not surprisingly, Sarah Palin responded and showed us nothing is too big or small to politicize and polarize. (JW, why the hell is she always on TV. If liberals just left her alone and stopped trying to pin her every move then her apologists would never be able to paint her as a martyr. Instead her every move is broken down by AP “fact-checkers” and scrutinized, jeez, she’s just as unemployed as I am!. It’s almost as if its strategic, get her spotlight up so dems can face her later in 2012)

Anyways I bring this up, not to crack on either of the two but because of my own behavior around a member of my former church who is retarded. I don’t mean this in the sense of “I hate this kid, he’s a retard”, but objectively retarded, with mild cognitive and social deficiencies. This man lets call him “Jon”; a consistently faithful member and attendee of the church, is mildly retarded insofar as he is capable of driving a vehicle and engaging in most discussions, but has social quirks that can be somewhat distracting and has slower cognitive function. For instance, his remarks in some discussions were considered “conversation-killers” and even though he sometimes was unintentionally rude, nevertheless, he made all sorts of people quite uncomfortable.

I overheard one member of my church tell me that there were a few people who found it irritating that they had to sit next to Jon during a group event. This of course caused the bells to ring in my head, as I angrily denounced their antipathy towards this guy who meant no ill or harm. What the F!@# is their problem?? Self-righteousness kicked in full gear.

But as Zosima says, “Each one of us is guilty before everybody for everything, and I am more guilty than anybody else.” I remember many key instances where I would intentionally avoid lengthy conversations with him, especially in group settings. I found his presence to be most of the time a nuisance and did my best to just avoid him. It wasn’t that I hated him per se, I just didn’t want him to be around me. I had been discussing this with a friend, when he reminded me of Matthew 5:22:

“You have heard that it was said to those of old,’You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, Raca! will be liable to the hell of fire.

What a radical message! For those who think the Christian faith should be a display of conservative morals and values, guess what, the very leader of the faith is saying, merely practicing good deeds is not enough, even our very tainted thoughts are deserving of highest condemnation. I don’t think you need to be “born-again” to realize the impact of what JC is saying. You see, “Raca!” here translates to “you fool!” When a person is driven to murder, he desires to existentially eliminate another person. In essence, he is trying to say, “I hate you so much, I’d rather not have you around anymore.”Jesus points out in the same way that when we are angry at someone, when we say “Raca!” we are saying to that person, “I wish you didn’t exist.” Murder, to Christ, was an intense desire that wished a certain person removed from your life. Surely, I didn’t plan on murdering this guy or harbor any thoughts of doing so? Yet, where was my heart just a second ago; while I didn’t cut him out physically from existence, I just chose to amputate him from any personal contact. When I said before, “I didn’t want him to be around me”,  what made me really all that different?

You know its really easy to be patient towards that really cute girl, the absolutely charming guy or the person you are marrying! I think it is great that many couples strive to be patient with each other. However, true patience should extend towards those who are most trying to us. Its easier to be patient to the person you like so much that you find yourself engaging in DeBeer’s swindle of paying two months salary. (No a diamond isn’t forever) How about showing patience to someone who irritates you immensely by always talking about pro wrestling?

I remember in school we were taught the concept of being “politically correct”; we were not to use the term retarded and instead accept these students as “special”. Yet, this word “special” held little sway in my heart and mind, because realistically there was nothing special about these kids to me. In a culture that told me to value accomplishments, awards and status, these students were surely on the low end of the totem pole. Fine, I will acknowledge their nominal specialness only to assuage the concerns of my insufferably liberal teacher. The problem here was that by forcing me to recite this line about their specialness, somehow this would sensitivity training would be sufficient to change my attitudes towards those who were handicapped. In the same sense, the solution is not changing our outward sensitivity towards others.

What bothers me the most is that this man will find great difficulty in finding a wife, never have any potential for a lucrative career and will continue to face a certain amount of ostracism due to his condition. It seems almost morbid to admit such, but it makes me wonder about how this world keeps on spinning? Is his redemption his achievement? I hope not. I wonder why then I need to do the same for myself. This is where I can understand liberation from being around the “weakest” of us. Society reminds us that our accomplishments give us our value and meaning, yet this notion becomes inevitably paralyzing. As grow and look around me, so many people can literally jump higher, run faster and travel further than me. I know self-centeredness in my own accomplishments becomes crushing in the face of my own imperfection. No matter how many battles we win in this world, if we keep the discussion centered on the here and now, death currently has an undefeated record.

Call me crazy but this causes me to place my hope in something else. Relationships become meaningful and beautiful when we realize that we love someone for not what they accomplish, but for who they are. JC demonstrates this love to us simply and forcefully on the cross. In that sense, the humility that comes from understanding this message helps us to embrace those around us who are difficult to love. We shouldn’t love the Jons of the world because we are forced to, we should love them because to God we are more unlovable than Jon could ever be to us. I hope in that way people can be convicted to love Jon.

(Its interesting because it makes me think about how politicized the abortion debate has become in Christian circles. While I do find conservative arguments persuasive about the sanctity of life, I have to take a more Haeurwas-ian approach to the topic. I think if anything JC’s statement implicates conservatives just as strongly. This is not to morally equivocate and say abortion is ok, but to say that sitting back and merely harboring resentment towards the act is just as evil as the murder you view abortion is. A viewpoint I probably need to think about and ponder more…)

Perhaps I can continue to try to find a way to make my mark on this world, to achieve greatness. But looking at Jon and his own faith, I think I need to start thinking about looking towards a different direction.

Thanks Jah-Mez

Bookmark and Share

%d bloggers like this: